APICS The Association for Operations Management

Wichita Chapter 71

 

Advancing Productivity, Innovation, and Competitive Success

 

 

   
line

Main MenuBackNext

APICS Wichita Chapter 71 March 2007 Newsletter page 5

Article of the Month
Decision Making

Gene Brockmeier, CFPIM, CIRM Manufacturing Education & Systems, Inc

”Each indecision brings its own delays and days are lost lamenting over lost days... What you can do or think you can do … begin it. For boldness has magic, power, and genius in it”  Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

The success of many projects hinges on our ability to quickly make sound decisions. Inevitably, projects are late. The ability to make decisions quickly can help to bring projects in on schedule and budget. On occasion, there is justification to leave out a segment of a project if implementing it later doesn’t impact the intent of the project. I can remember projects where I had to address 100 – 200 questions in the course of a single day! Projects requiring new functionality and new technology are the toughest and can require constant analysis and decision making. 

Decisions are needed to determine the direction the project is going to take, organizational structuring & responsibilities and procedures. Decisions are needed from the project manager, technology, the steering committee and the project champion.

Decisions need to be made to address a number of issues including: responsibilities, funding, business functions, procedures, organization structure and technology.

I’ve had a few experiences where decisions were slow in coming or didn’t come at all.  The impact varied in degree but the effects were much the same.  During one project, we had built a team of operations and technical members.  The project undertaking involved both new processes and new technology making things quite complex. We struggled for over a year for a go/no go decision from the project sponsor/organization. The project sponsor could not quite seem to make up his/her mind on whether to fund or not fund the project. The impact to the project was poor morale, people left the project out of boredom or disenchantment and much money was wasted not going anywhere.  It would have been better to have delayed the project for a year or two than to let it struggle for one and a half years, wasting much time, money, benefits and morale. I truly believe that if a decision would have been made in a timely manner, the project, although eventually successful, would have been even better.

Indecision may have the following effects on projects:

  • We work on something else until the decision is made causing loss of momentum

  • Additional cost in trying to catch up on tasks that have been delayed by a decision

  • The project tasks that are dependent on the decision are delayed and may delay the project if the task is on the critical path

  • We lose focus on the task at hand until the decision is made

  • Leads people to make alternative decisions which may be incorrect

  • Is sometimes proof of lack of leadership & lack of respect for the project

·       Work on activities out of sequence while a decision is pending

  • Additional training of new project team members

  • User community loses interest  

apics
apics
For more information, e-mail Brian Ferris at president@apics-wichita.com
.
apics
Inside this issue: (1.) MARCH PDM,  (2.) PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE  (3.) SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE CLASSES, (4.)WHITE PAPERS   (5.) ARTICLE,  (6.) SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION Main Menu

Home  |  Newsletters  |  Education  |  Information  |  Contact 
© Copyright Wichita APICS 2007